4.6 Review

Venous and Arterial Thromboembolism in Patients With Cancer JACC: Cardio Oncology State-of-the-Art Review

Journal

JACC: CARDIOONCOLOGY
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages 173-190

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2021.03.001

Keywords

arterial thromboembolism; cancer-associated thrombosis; prophylaxis; risk assessment models; treatment; venous thromboembolism

Funding

  1. Sondra and Stephen Hardis Chair in Oncology Research
  2. Consortium Linking Oncology with Thrombosis (CLOT) grant from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [U01 HL143402]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

VTE, including DVT and PE, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients, with higher risk seen in specific cancers; DOACs are emerging as the preferred treatment option, but managing VTE beyond 6 months and challenging clinical situations remain knowledge gaps.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer. Arterial thromboembolism, including myocardial infarction and stroke, is also prevalent. Risk differs in subgroups, with higher rates observed in specific cancers including pancreas, stomach, and multiple myeloma. Thromboprophylaxis is recommended for most patients with active cancer hospitalized for medical illnesses and after major cancer surgery. Outpatient thromboprophylaxis is not routinely recommended, but emerging data suggest that a high-risk population that benefits from pharmacological thromboprophylaxis can be identified using a validated risk tool. Direct oral anticoagulants are emerging as the preferred new option for the treatment of cancer-associated VTE, although low-molecular-weight heparin remains a standard for patients at high bleeding risk. Management of VTE beyond the first 6 months and challenging clinical situations including intracranial metastases and thrombocytopenia require careful management in balancing the benefits and risks of anti-coagulation and remain major knowledge gaps in evidence. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available