4.7 Article

Lattice QCD calculation of the electroweak box diagrams for the kaon semileptonic decays

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 103, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.114503

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSFC of China [11775002, 12070131001]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2020YFA0406400]
  3. EU [824093]
  4. CONACyT [278017]
  5. DFG [SP 778/4-1, 196253076-TRR110]
  6. DOE Office of Science Early Career Award [DE-SC0021147]
  7. DOE [DE-SC0010339]
  8. NSFC [11621131001]
  9. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  10. Argonne Leadership Class Facility, a DOE Office of Science Facility [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  11. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy
  12. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0021147] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We conducted a lattice QCD calculation to study the axial gamma W-box diagrams relevant for kaon semileptonic decays. By utilizing a recently proposed method, we were able to connect electroweak radiative corrections in Sirlin's representation to that in chiral perturbation theory, allowing us to confirm low energy constants from first principles. Our results also showed a significant reduction in uncertainties compared to previous models.
We present a lattice QCD calculation of the axial gamma W-box diagrams relevant for the kaon semileptonic decays. We utilize a recently proposed method, which connects the electroweak radiative corrections in Sirlin's representation to that in chiral perturbation theory. It allows us to use the axial gamma W-box correction in the SU(3) limit to obtain the low energy constants for chiral perturbation theory. From first principles our results confirm the previously used low energy constants provided by the minimal resonance model with a significant reduction in uncertainties.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available