4.5 Article

Cost-Effectiveness of an Exercise Programme That Provided Group or Individual Training to Reduce the Fall Risk in Healthy Community-Dwelling People Aged 65-80: A Secondary Data Analysis

Journal

HEALTHCARE
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9060714

Keywords

cost-effectiveness; risk fall; older adults; randomized controlled trial; Otago Exercise Program; Tinetti; timed up and go; short physical performance battery; direct healthcare costs

Funding

  1. Spanish National Fund for Health Research (ISCIII-Subdireccion General de Evaluacion y Fomento de la Investigacion) [PI16CIII/00031, PI16/01520, PI16/00821, PI16/01316, PI16/01649, PI16/01042, PI16/01159, PI16/01312]
  2. Regional Fund for Health Research (Pais Vasco Murcia) [2016111005, FFIS17/AP/02/04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Program in reducing fall risk among healthy older individuals by comparing group and individual training. Results showed that group delivery was more cost-effective and led to a 10% decrease in fall risk, providing evidence for the superiority of the group sessions over individual sessions.
Research has demonstrated that some exercise programs are effective for reducing fall rates in community-dwelling older people; however, the literature is limited in providing clear recommendations of individual or group training as a result of economic evaluation. The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of the Otago Exercise Program (OEP) for reducing the fall risk in healthy, non-institutionalized older people. An economic evaluation of a multicenter, blinded, randomized, non-inferiority clinical trial was performed on 498 patients aged over 65 in primary care. Participants were randomly allocated to the treatment or control arms, and group or individual training. The program was delivered in primary healthcare settings and comprised five initial sessions, ongoing encouragement and support to exercise at home, and a reinforcement session after six months. Our hypothesis was that the patients who received the intervention would achieve better health outcomes and therefore need lower healthcare resources during the follow-up, thus, lower healthcare costs. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, which used the timed up and go test results as an effective measure for preventing falls. The secondary outcomes included differently validated tools that assessed the fall risk. The cost per patient was USD 51.28 lower for the group than the individual sessions in the control group, and the fall risk was 10% lower when exercises had a group delivery. The OEP program delivered in a group manner was superior to the individual method. We observed slight differences in the incremental cost estimations when using different tools to assess the risk of fall, but all of them indicated the dominance of the intervention group. The OEP group sessions were more cost-effective than the individual sessions, and the fall risk was 10% lower.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available