4.3 Article

Preparation and Characterizations of Cross-linked Sulfonated Poly(ether ether ketone)/Partially Fluorinated Sulfonated Poly(aryl ether sulfone)Blend Membranes

Journal

CHEMICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE UNIVERSITIES-CHINESE
Volume 42, Issue 6, Pages 2002-2007

Publisher

HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS
DOI: 10.7503/cjcu20200759

Keywords

Blending and cross-linking; Sulfonated poly(ether ether ketone); Partially fluorinated sulfonated poly(aryl ether sulfone); Proton exchange membrane; Fuel cell

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [30920021114]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The new blend and cross-linked proton exchange membrane exhibits excellent mechanical strength and improved physicochemical stability in dry state, achieved through good compatibility and dispersion between SPEEK and SPFAES, as well as rearrangement and cross-linking of polymer chains.
A type of blend and cross-linked proton exchange membrane (CMB) based on sulfonated poly (ether ether ketone) (SPEEK)/partially fluorinated sulfonated poly (aryl ether sulfone) (SPFAES) were prepared, and the properties including water uptake, swelling ratio, mechanical properties, thermal properties, proton conductivity, chemical stability and fuel cell performances of the CMBs were evaluated. The cross-linking structure was constructed in the blend system by adding dehydrating agent during solution casting. The results indicate that the CMB membranes all exhibit excellent mechanical strength in dry state and greatly improved physicochemcial stability due to the good compatibility and dispersion between SPEEK and SPFAES, and the rearrangement and cross-linking of polymer chains. With low ion exchange capacity (1.21-1.51 mmol/g), the proton conductivities of CMB membranes reach 122-219 mS/cm (80 degrees C), and the maximum power density of the CMB4 membrane achieves 530.5 mW/cm(2) (80 degrees C) in a single hydrogen-oxygen fuel cell.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available