4.5 Article

Mitigating the impacts of fragmented land tenure through community-based institutional innovations: two case study villages from Guinan County of Qinghai Province, China

Journal

ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
Volume 26, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

RESILIENCE ALLIANCE
DOI: 10.5751/ES-12326-260215

Keywords

community-based management; grazing quota system; institutional scale; rangeland land tenure; rangeland transfer

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Project [41901241, 71703126]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2018M631500]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JBK2101035]
  4. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture [CA-B-ECO-0117-MS]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) Advanced Grant Project PASTRES project (Pastoralism, Uncertainty & Resilience: Global Lessons from the Margins)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The privatization of collectively used rangelands has resulted in new grazing management systems in pastoral areas of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Two main systems have emerged: renting allocated grazing land parcels and a community-based grazing quota system. While the rented system has higher above-ground biomass, it also leads to changes in vegetation composition and lower carbon and nitrogen density compared to the community-based system. The case study villages show that addressing rangeland fragmentation and improving vegetation conditions may require institutions operating at both household and community scales.
The privatization of collectively used rangelands results in fragmentation of land use in pastoral areas. This affects pastoralists' grazing strategies and results in new institutional arrangements for addressing changing social-ecological systems. Two main systems of grazing management have emerged in the pastoral regions of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau that offer new perspectives on addressing rangeland fragmentation. One allows the renting of parcels of allocated grazing land to or from others (RTS) and is based on having fenced contracted parcels for each household. The other is a community-based grazing quota system (GQS) in which a grazing use quota is allocated to each household, while the community maintains collective use of the rangeland. We compare two case study villages implementing these two different management systems, operating across household and community scales, and analyze vegetation composition, above-ground biomass, and soil properties as indicators of impacts. Transects reveal that above-ground biomass was higher under the RTS than under the GQS, but species composition shifted to dominance by non-palatable forbs and graminoids. The RTS grasslands had lower carbon and nitrogen density compared to GQS-managed grasslands. These differences are consistent with the herder's perceptions of ecological changes. The general improvement of rangeland conditions under the GQS may be linked to greater herd mobility and the control of livestock numbers through the establishment of community-enforced grazing quotas. Mobility under the RTS is limited to a few parcels, and local regulation of stocking rates is minimal because the system relies on external intervention. The case of GQS suggests that addressing rangeland fragmentation with improved vegetation conditions requires institutions operating at both household and community scales allowing for mobility and regulation of stocking rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available