4.6 Article

Ion track etching of polycarbonate membranes monitored by in situ small angle X-ray scattering

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 23, Issue 26, Pages 14231-14241

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1cp02063c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Government through the Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, in situ small angle X-ray scattering was used to monitor the ion track etching process in polycarbonate foils, providing detailed information about the etching kinetics and nanopore size and distribution. The results show that the etching process can be described by an Arrhenius law, and radial etching exhibits a power law dependency on etchant concentration.
In situ small angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) measurements of ion track etching in polycarbonate foils are used to directly monitor the selective dissolution of ion tracks with high precision, including the early stages of etching. Detailed information about the track etching kinetics and size, shape, and size distribution of an ensemble of nanopores is obtained. Time resolved measurements as a function of temperature and etchant concentration show that the pore radius increases almost linearly with time for all conditions and the etching process can be described by an Arrhenius law. The radial etching shows a power law dependency on the etchant concentration. An increase in the etch rate with increasing temperature or concentration of the etchant reduces the penetration of the etchant into the polymer but does not affect the pore size distribution. The in situ measurements provide an estimate for the track etch rate, which is found to be approximately three orders of magnitude higher than the radial etch rate. The measurement methodology enables new experiments studying membrane fabrication and performance in liquid environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available