4.7 Article

CANet: Context Aware Network for Brain Glioma Segmentation

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING
Volume 40, Issue 7, Pages 1763-1777

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2021.3065918

Keywords

Image segmentation; Tumors; Graph neural networks; Three-dimensional displays; Feature extraction; Two dimensional displays; Semantics; Brain glioma; conditional random field; graph convolutional network; image segmentation

Funding

  1. Royal Society-Newton Advanced Fellowship [NA160342]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a novel method called CANet for brain glioma segmentation, which outperforms other methods and is better at incorporating contextual information of tumor cells and their surrounding environment.
Automated segmentation of brain glioma plays an active role in diagnosis decision, progression monitoring and surgery planning. Based on deep neural networks, previous studies have shown promising technologies for brain glioma segmentation. However, these approaches lack powerful strategies to incorporate contextual information of tumor cells and their surrounding, which has been proven as a fundamental cue to deal with local ambiguity. In this work, we propose a novel approach named Context-Aware Network (CANet) for brain glioma segmentation. CANet captures high dimensional and discriminative features with contexts from both the convolutional space and feature interaction graphs. We further propose context guided attentive conditional random fields which can selectively aggregate features. We evaluate our method using publicly accessible brain glioma segmentation datasets BRATS2017, BRATS2018 and BRATS2019. The experimental results show that the proposed algorithm has better or competitive performance against several State-of-The-Art approaches under different segmentation metrics on the training and validation sets.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available