4.4 Article

Exploring differences between international business undergraduates' conceptual understanding

Journal

STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION
Volume 46, Issue 6, Pages 1041-1054

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2019.1672642

Keywords

Higher education; conceptual understanding; international business undergraduates; cross-sectional study; international education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found three types of conceptual understanding among international business undergraduates: limited, developing, and extensive. The relationship between conceptual understanding and study progress was nonlinear, suggesting factors other than curriculum may contribute to differences between students. Recommendations were made for adjusting curricula to accommodate student differences and for curriculum development.
Higher education providers need to deliver graduates with the conceptual understanding required for professional life. Conceptual understanding entails a synthesis of relevant facts, theories and practices that influence occupational performance. To help align curricula with individual student differences, this study investigates differences in international business undergraduates' conceptual understanding with regard to study progress. Seventy-four international business students of a bachelor's programme in the Netherlands participated. Students were presented with a complex business problem. They then wrote essays in which they explicated their conceptual understanding of the case. Using a rubric, six components of conceptual understanding were graded on a 5-point scale ranging from negligible to extraordinary. Results indicated three types of conceptual understanding: limited, developing and extensive. Their relationship with study progress was nonlinear, indicating that effects other than curriculum may account for differences between students. Suggestions are made to account for differences, and recommendations are made regarding curriculum development.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available