4.7 Article

Revisiting the Neural Architecture of Adolescent Decision-Making: Univariate and Multivariate Evidence for System-Based Models

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 41, Issue 28, Pages -

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE

Keywords

Adolescence; Risk-Taking; Neurodevelopment; Brain Modeling; fMRI

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding adolescent decision-making is crucial for neurodevelopment models, public health, and criminal justice. By analyzing fMRI data on adolescent risk-taking, this study supports system-based theories, showing how neural activity in the lateral prefrontal cortex and nucleus accumbens can predict risk-taking behaviors, without any interactions with age.
Understanding adolescent decision-making is significant for informing basic models of neurodevelopment as well as for the domains of public health and criminal justice. System-based theories posit that adolescent decision-making is guided by activity amongst reward and control processes. While successful at explaining behavior, system-based theories have received inconsistent support at the neural level, perhaps because of methodological limitations. Here, we used two complementary approaches to overcome said limitations and rigorously evaluate system-based models. Using decision-level modeling of fMRI data from a risk-taking task in a sample of 2000+ decisions across 51 human adolescents (25 females, mean age = 15.00 years), we find support for system-based theories of decision-making. Neural activity in lateral prefrontal cortex and a multivariate pattern of cognitive control both predicted a reduced likelihood of risk-taking, whereas increased activity in the nucleus accumbens predicted a greater likelihood of risk-taking. Interactions between decision-level brain activity and age were not observed. These results garner support for system-based accounts of adolescent decision-making behavior.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available