4.7 Article

Comparative life cycle energy and greenhouse gas footprints of dry and wet torrefaction processes of various biomass feedstocks

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105415

Keywords

Biochar; Dry torrefaction; Hydrochar; Wet torrefaction; Energy; NER; Life cycle assessment; GHG

Funding

  1. NSERC/Cenovus/Alberta Innovates Associate Industrial Research Chair in Energy and Environmental Systems Engineering
  2. Cenovus Energy Endowed Chair in Environmental Engineering at the University of Alberta
  3. Canada First Research Excellence Fund (CFREF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares the life cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions of electricity generation from bio-coals produced from various biomass feedstocks via dry torrefaction and wet torrefaction processes. Results show that most pathways are competitive with coal-based electricity in terms of GHG emissions, with pine woodchips biochar-based electricity generation being the best option in terms of emissions reduction and net energy ratios. Sensitivity analysis of various factors was conducted, and the developed information can be used for investment decisions and policy formulation globally.
This study compares the life cycle energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of electricity generation from bio-coals produced from various biomass feedstocks via dry torrefaction (DT) and wet torrefaction (WT) processes. Wheat straw, pine woodchips, grape pomace, manure and algae are the main feedstocks evaluated. The energy consumption and the associated GHG emissions at each life cycle stage were calculated. The main stages included are in-field preparation, feedstocks transportation to torrefaction plant, torrefaction process, bio-coal transportation to power plant, and power plant operations. The results show that all pathways are competitive with coal-based electricity in terms of GHG emissions except pathways with algae as feedstock and manure biochar-based electricity generation. Among the pathways, electricity generation from pine woodchips biochar appears to be the best option, with an 82% GHG emissions reduction compared to coalderived electricity, followed by wheat starw biochar and grape pomace hydrochar with 80% and 75% emission reductions, respectively. Electricity generation from wheat straw biochar, pine woodchips biochar, and grape pomace hydrochar lead to the highest net energy ratios (NERs) of 4.19, 3.58, and 2.59, respectively. The results also show that the combustion of the biomass for supplying electricity used in the plant decreases GHG emissions in all pathways particularly in WT ones. Sensitivity analysis of using different emissions allocation methods, transportation distances to torrefaction plant and to power plant, emission factor of electricity consumed, and quantity of natural gas consumed were aslo conducted. The developed information is novel and can be used for investment decisions and policy formulation around the world.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available