4.2 Article

A trial toward sub-100 nm motion error compensation of ultra-precision machine tool using on-machine metrology system with chromatic confocal probe

Publisher

JAPAN SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1299/jamdsm.2021jamdsm0048

Keywords

On-machine measurement; Ultra-precision machine tool; Chromatic confocal probe; Feed forward compensation machining; Motion error compensation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the compensation of motion errors of an ultra-precision machine tool using the OMM system was utilized to improve the quality of machining precision optics with aspherical or free-form optical surfaces. Through experiments with feed-forward motion error compensation, the peak-to-valley profile error was reduced from 125.3 nm to 42.1 nm.
Aspherical or free-form optical surface machining using an ultra-precision machine tool is a common and effective method used in the manufacturing of precision optics. However, this method sometimes causes waviness due to mid-spatial frequency (MSF) motion errors of the machine. This waviness lowers the quality of the optical surface. To compensate for the motion error, we use the waviness of the motion error of the axial displacement of an ultra-precision machine tool. This waviness is obtained by a non-contact on-machine metrology (OMM) system that measures an optical flat as a reference. The OMM system consists of a displacement probe and a machine tool axis position capture device. The probe system uses a chromatic confocal probe on an ultra-precision machine tool to evaluate the form deviation of the workpiece with 1-nm resolution. The axis position capture system uses a linear-scale signal branch circuit on each axis of the ultra-precision machine tool. The OMM system is tested in terms of accuracy and repeatability. Through shaper cutting experiments of an oxygen-free copper (OFC) workpiece with feed-forward motion error compensation, we reduce the peak-to-valley (p-v) profile error from 125.3 nm to 42.1 nm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available