3.8 Article

Effects of a low-dose Copenhagen adduction exercise intervention on adduction strength in sub-elite male footballers: A randomised controlled trial

Journal

TRANSLATIONAL SPORTS MEDICINE
Volume 4, Issue 4, Pages 447-457

Publisher

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1002/tsm2.238

Keywords

Copenhagen adduction exercise; football; hip adduction strength; injury prevention; soccer

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The results of the study suggest that the low-dose Copenhagen adduction exercise intervention is insufficient to modify eccentric hip adduction strength, but it does improve peak adductor squeeze strength.
Footballers with weak hip adductors are at increased risk of groin injury, and adductor strengthening has been shown to reduce this risk. However, the minimal effective dose of strength training to improve hip adductor strength and mitigate the risk of adductor problems remains unknown. The aim of this randomised controlled trial was to investigate the training and detraining effects of a low-dose Copenhagen adduction exercise (CA) intervention in sub-elite male footballers on eccentric hip adduction strength (primary outcome) and peak adductor squeeze strength (secondary outcome). Thirty-nine male footballers were randomised into two groups: The intervention group completed the CA twice weekly during six in-season weeks in addition to normal football training, while the control group continued normal football training. Strength testing was performed at weeks 0, 3, 6 (training period), and weeks 7-9 (detraining period). There was no between-group difference in eccentric strength at week 6 and 9. There was a significant group by time interaction at 6 weeks (0.52 Nm/kg, 95% CI 0.17-0.86) and 9 weeks (0.59 Nm/kg, 95% CI 0.25-0.93) at which the intervention group displayed greater adductor squeeze strength. These results suggest the low-dose CA intervention is insufficient to modify eccentric hip adduction strength but improves peak adductor squeeze strength.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available