4.1 Review

A critical review of the Water Sorptivity Index (WSI) parameter for potential durability assessment: Can WSI be considered in isolation of porosity?

Publisher

SAICE-SAISI
DOI: 10.17159/2309-8775/2021/V63n2a4

Keywords

concrete durability; durability index; water sorptivity; porosity; absorption

Funding

  1. Concrete Materials and Structural Integrity Research Unit (CoMSIRU) at the University of Cape Town
  2. AVENG
  3. Water Research Commission of South Africa (WRC)
  4. South African Department of Water and Sanitation
  5. Transnet
  6. PPC Cement (Pty) Ltd
  7. AfriSam
  8. Lafarge
  9. SIKA
  10. Haw Inglis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper examines the Durability Index approach used in South Africa, suggesting that porosity should be adopted as an additional index. It concludes that sorptivity cannot be interpreted without also considering the porosity value, as these two parameters are interrelated.
The Durability Index (DI) approach used in South Africa is linked to transport-related properties of the cover layer of concrete. This performance-based approach utilises three different durability-related parameters, namely Water Sorptivity Index (WSI), Oxygen Permeability Index (OPI) and Chloride Conductivity Index (CCI). In the water sorptivity test, both the sorptivity and the water-penetrable porosity of the concrete are measured. Until now, porosity has not been considered directly as a separate durability-related parameter. This paper analyses these implications and suggests that porosity should be adopted as a further index. The paper concludes that sorptivity cannot be interpreted without also reflecting the porosity value since these two parameters are inter-related.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available