4.3 Article

PRACTICES FOR LEARNING IN EARLY CAREERS

Journal

ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT LEARNING & EDUCATION
Volume 20, Issue 2, Pages 182-202

Publisher

ACAD MANAGEMENT
DOI: 10.5465/amle.2019.0019

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UFHRD

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This empirical study explores how fresh graduates prepare themselves for the early stages of their careers through learning practices, revealing a gap between espoused and enacted learning practices. The research offers insights into the relationship between learning practices and early-career success, highlighting the importance of unique learning practices that emerge over time.
Against a backdrop of competitive labor markets, employers have questioned business schools' ability to prepare fresh graduates to 'hit the ground running'. This empirical study explores the research question, How do fresh graduates prepare themselves for the early stages of their careers through the use of learning practices? The findings show a gap between students' espoused and enacted learning practices, as graduates transition from the scaffolds of university learning to an autonomous practice-based way of learning. Espoused learning practices engage a top-down causal approach involving goal-setting and identifying resources, while enacted learning practices involve a bottom-up effectuation process that is about discovery, improvisation and reflexivity. For the first contribution, I offer a more nuanced view of learning practices in the form of practices for learning that involves 'doing to learn'. The second provides insight from the coalescence between sociomateriality and self-directed learning to shape bespoke practices for learning in support of early-career success. Third, I offer more granularity to the notion of learning careers. I argue that distinctive practices for learning that emerge over time help with overcoming challenges associated with important episodes in graduates' careers, such as in their early careers and career change.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available