4.5 Article

Following nuclei through nucleosynthesis: A novel tracing technique

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 104, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.104.015803

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy [DE-FG02-95-ER40934]
  2. topical collaboration Fission In R-process Elements (FIRE) [DE-AC52-07NA27344]
  3. SciDAC [DE-SC0018232]
  4. National Nuclear Security Administration of U.S. Department of Energy [89233218CNA000001]
  5. Los Alamos National Laboratory Center for Space and Earth Science - Laboratory Directed Research and Development program [20180475DR]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy through Los Alamos National Laboratory
  7. Laboratory Directed Research and Development program of Los Alamos National Laboratory [20190021DR]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Astrophysical nucleosynthesis is a complex process involving interactions between thousands of nuclei. A new technique, nucleosynthesis tracing, is used in this work to quantify the fraction of nuclear abundances passing through individual nuclear reactions. This technique is applied to study fission and beta(-) decay in the rapid neutron capture (r) process of nucleosynthesis.
Astrophysical nucleosynthesis is a family of diverse processes by which atomic nuclei undergo nuclear reactions and decay to form new nuclei. The complex nature of nucleosynthesis, which can involve as many as tens of thousands of interactions between thousands of nuclei, makes it difficult to study any one of these interactions in isolation using standard approaches. In this work, we present a new technique, nucleosynthesis tracing, that we use to quantify the relative fraction of nuclear abundances that pass through individual nuclear reaction, decay, and fission processes at any point during nucleosynthesis. We apply this technique to study fission and beta(-) decay as they occur in the rapid neutron capture (r) process of nucleosynthesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available