4.6 Article

Dyakonov surface magnons and magnon polaritons

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 104, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.045407

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [HL2020A014, ZD2009103]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, one Dyakonov surface magnon (DSM) and two Dyakonov magnon polaritons (DSMPs) localized at the antiferromagnet (AF)-air interface were predicted. The DSM is the magnetostatic limit of the first DSMP, while the second DSMP lies outside the frequency band. The DSMPs exhibit hybrid-polarization characteristics with different attenuation constants, making them suitable for experimental observation.
We predicted one Dyakonov surface magnon (DSM) and two Dyakonov magnon polaritons (DSMPs) localized at the antiferromagnet (AF)-air interface. Their concise dispersion equations and necessary conditions of existence were obtained. The DSM is the magnetostatic limit of the first DSMP, which are situated inside the AF reststrahlen frequency band. The second DSMP has no magnetostatic limit and lies outside the frequency band. The specifical frequency ranges occupied by the DSM and DSMPs were analytically found. The DSMPs are hybrid-polarization surface polaritons and the DSM is a hybrid-polarization surface magnetostatic mode. The first DSMP possesses large attenuation constants so that it is highly localized at the surface. Compared with it, the second DSMP exhibits relatively small attenuation constants. According to the features of polarization obtained for either DSMP, we used the TE and TM radiations incident on the AF surface to calculate attenuated total reflection (ATR) spectra, respectively. These ATR spectra not only further prove the existence of the DSMPs but also demonstrate their observability in experiment. However, the DSM should be detected by means of a light-scattering technique.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available