4.6 Article

Low expression of miR-195 is associated with cell proliferation, glycolysis and poor survival in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive but not in triple negative breast cancer

Journal

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 3320-+

Publisher

E-CENTURY PUBLISHING CORP

Keywords

MicroRNA; miR-195; cell proliferation; glycolysis; breast cancer; TCGA; METABRIC; GSEA

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R01CA160688]
  2. National Cancer Institute (NCI) [P30CA016056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MiR-195 is a tumor suppressive microRNA that has been studied in breast cancer using data from two cohorts, showing that low expression of miR-195 is associated with aggressive cancer characteristics and poor prognosis.
MiR-195 is a tumor suppressive microRNA in breast cancer. Its clinical relevance remains debatable as it has only been studied via in vitro experiments or small cohort studies. We analyzed a total of 2,038 patients in the TCGA and METABRIC cohorts to assess whether low miR-195 expressing tumors are associated with aggressive cancer characteristics and poor prognostic outcomes. The median cutoff of miR-195 expression was used to split the groups into miR-195 high and low groups. Low miR-19 expressing tumors demonstrated high cell proliferating features by enriching the gene sets associated with cell proliferation, MKI67 expression and pathological grade. One-third of the top target miR-195 genes were related to cell proliferation. Low miR-195 expressing tumors were associated with both pro-cancerous and anti-cancerous immune cells. Low miR-195 expressing tumors were associated with enhanced glycolysis and poor survival in ER-positive tumors, but not other subtypes of breast cancer. In conclusion, low expression of miR-195 in ER-positive breast cancer was associated with enhanced cancer cell proliferation, glycolysis, and worse overall survival.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available