4.6 Review

Prognostic Performance and Reproducibility of the 1973 and 2004/2016 World Health Organization Grading Classification Systems in Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: A European Association of Urology Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer Guidelines Panel Systematic Review

Journal

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
Volume 72, Issue 5, Pages 801-813

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.015

Keywords

Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer; Grade; 1973 World Health Organization classification; 2004/2016 World Health; Organization classification; Prognosis; Recurrence; Progression; Repeatability; Reproducibility

Funding

  1. Janssen
  2. Ipsen
  3. Astellas
  4. GSK
  5. Bayer Healthcare
  6. Pfizer
  7. Amgen
  8. Novartis
  9. Glaxo Smithkline
  10. Takeda
  11. BMS
  12. MSD
  13. Roche
  14. Olympus
  15. Wolff
  16. Sanofi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Tumour grade is an important prognostic indicator in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). Histopathological classifications are limited by interobserver variability (reproducibility), which may have prognostic implications. European Association of Urology NMIBC guidelines suggest concurrent use of both 1973 and 2004/2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classifications. Objective: To compare the prognostic performance and reproducibility of the 1973 and 2004/2016 WHO grading systems for NMIBC. Evidence acquisition: A systematic literature search was undertaken incorporating Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies were critically appraised for risk of bias (QUIPS). For prognosis, the primary outcome was progression to muscle-invasive or metastatic disease. Secondary outcomes were disease recurrence, and overall and cancer-specific survival. For reproducibility, the primary outcome was interobserver variability between pathologists. Secondary outcome was intraobserver variability (repeatability) by the same pathologist. Evidence synthesis: Of 3593 articles identified, 20 were included in the prognostic review; three were eligible for the reproducibility review. Increasing tumour grade in both classifications was associated with higher disease progression and recurrence rates. Progression rates in grade 1 patients were similar to those in low-grade patients; progression rates in grade 3 patients were higher than those in high-grade patients. Survival data were limited. Reproducibility of the 2004/2016 system was marginally better than that of the 1973 system. Two studies on repeatability showed conflicting results. Most studies had a moderate to high risk of bias. Conclusions: Current grading classifications in NMIBC are suboptimal. The 1973 system identifies more aggressive tumours. Intra-and interobserver variability was slightly less in the 2004/2016 classification. We could not confirm that the 2004/2016 classification outperforms the 1973 classification in prediction of recurrence and progression. Patient summary: This article summarises the utility of two different grading systems for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Both systems predict progression and recurrence, although pathologists vary in their reporting; suggestions for further improvements are made. (C) 2017 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available