4.2 Article

Identification of biodegradable polymers as contaminants in the thermoplastic recycling process

Journal

DYNA
Volume 96, Issue 4, Pages 415-421

Publisher

FEDERACION ASOCIACIONES INGENIEROS INDUSTRIALES ESPANA
DOI: 10.6036/10102

Keywords

recycling; biodegradable plastics; polypropylene; polystyrene; polyethylene terephthalate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study characterized the presence of biodegradable polymers in recycled plastics using FTIR and DSC techniques, revealing the impact of different biodegradable polymers on the properties of recycled plastic materials. Additionally, the study investigated how the performance of recycled PET blends contaminated with TPS and PHB changes over time.
In this work, the presence of biodegradable polymers in recycled plastic materials was characterized using readily available techniques. Recycled polypropylene (PP), polystyrene (PS) and polyethylene terephthalate (PET) were studied. The contamination of these plastics with polylactic acid (PLA), polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) and thermoplastic starch (TPS) was simulated using 10 wt.% of the contaminant. Fourier transform infrared spectrometry (FTIR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) were used as characterization techniques. In addition, the effect of aging on recycled products from PET blends contaminated with TPS and PHB was studied. The results show changes in the intensity of the FTIR spectra bands of the PS and PP blends contaminated with biodegradable polymers. By DSC, changes in the cold crystallization peak of recycled PET are observed when mixed with TPS and PHB. When the contaminant is PLA, the changes are masked due to the thermal characteristics of both materials. In PS, changes in the calorimetric curves are identified by the presence of PLA and PHB. Contamination with PLA, PHB and TPS hinders the processing of recycled PET after one year of storage due to the aging of the material.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available