4.6 Article

Lithium stripping: anisotropic evolution and faceting of pits revealed by operando 3-D microscopy

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 9, Issue 37, Pages 21013-21023

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ta03333f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) Vehicle Technologies Office (VTO) [DE-EE00008855]
  2. National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship [DGE1256260]
  3. University of Michigan College of Engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the dynamic evolution of Li metal surface morphology during stripping, revealing strong anisotropy and faceting in surface pits that correlate with surface microstructure. The results provide greater insight into the fundamental nature of Li stripping reactions and raise new questions about the role of microstructure in reversible cycling of Li metal.
A critical challenge that hinders the development of next-generation lithium (Li) metal batteries is the poor reversibility of Li plating and stripping. This study explores the dynamic evolution of Li metal surface morphology during stripping. A platform for operando focus variation microscopy is presented and used to reveal strong anisotropy and faceting in surface pits, which correlates with surface microstructure. Specifically, this study: (1) maps out the dynamic morphological evolution of individual pits in 3-dimensions; (2) demonstrates anisotropic pit expansion in both in-plane and through-plane directions; (3) correlates anisotropy with surface grain boundaries and crystallographic texture; and (4) demonstrates faceted edges in pits, which align within individual grain orientations. The results presented provide greater insight into the fundamental nature of Li stripping reactions and raise new questions about the role of microstructure in reversible cycling of Li metal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available