4.7 Article

Modified gravity: A unified approach

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 104, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.104.024010

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC Doctoral Training Programme [EP/R513143/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By proposing a new setup based on the original Einstein action, we can formulate modified gravity theories with second or fourth order field equations. Our theory is equivalent to the f(Q) gravity models, as well as capable of reproducing f(R) and f(T) gravity. Different from these theories, our approach emphasizes the importance of boundary terms in establishing the equivalence between them.
Starting from the original Einstein action, sometimes called the Gamma squared action, we propose a new setup to formulate modified theories of gravity. This can yield a theory with second order field equations similar to those found in other popular modified gravity models. Using a more general setting the theory gives fourth order equations. This model is based on the metric alone and does not require more general geometries. It is possible to show that our new theory and the recently proposed f(Q) gravity models are equivalent at the level of the action and at the level of the field equations, provided that appropriate boundary terms are taken into account. Our theory can also reproduce f(R) gravity, which is an expected result. Perhaps more surprisingly, we show that this equivalence extends to f(T) gravity at the level of the action and its field equations, provided that appropriate boundary terms are taken in account. While these three theories are conceptually different and are based on different geometrical settings, we can establish the necessary conditions under which their field equations are the same. The final part requires matter to couple minimally to gravity. Through this work we emphasize the importance played by boundary terms which are at the heart of our approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available