4.7 Article

Validation of a Fouling Measurement Procedure

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2020.3024430

Keywords

Distance sensor; fouling detection; measurement procedure; particle measurement; surface deposits

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (Spain) [RTI-2018-100765-B100]
  2. Predoctoral Program Xunta de Galicia [ED481A-2019/225]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The combustion of fuels results in the emission of particulate matter and the occurrence of fouling and slagging phenomena. It is important to identify the shape of particle layers to develop solutions for cleaning or preventing deposition on affected areas. A measurement procedure has been proposed to determine the thickness and profile of particle/ash layers deposited on surfaces.
The combustion of fuels usually involves the emission of particulate matter (PM) and occurrence of fouling and slagging phenomena, which are among the common drawbacks. In the case of fouling, the particles accumulate on the surfaces of certain devices, such as heat exchangers and electrostatic precipitators, leading to a reduction in their efficiencies. Identifying the shape of the layer of such particles can help develop solutions to these problems, such as the realization of an optimal cleaning procedure or the prevention of deposition on the critically affected areas. This study proposes a fouling measurement procedure that can be used to determine the thickness and profile of a particle/ash layer deposited on a surface. The system and methodology are validated by evaluating the accumulation of particles on the inner surface of a chimney during 40 h of operation and an electrostatic precipitator after 10 h of operation. The thickness of the PM layer is below 0.5 mm for the first case and above this value for the electrostatic precipitator. The worst case estimated uncertainty of the procedure is +/- 2%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available