4.6 Article

Random phase approximation for gapped systems: Role of vertex corrections and applicability of the constrained random phase approximation

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 104, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.045134

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Zentrale Forschungsforderung of the Universitat Bremen
  2. DFG [RTG 2247 QM3]
  3. European Research Council via Synergy [854843-FASTCORR]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The many-body theory of interacting electrons presents challenges that require simplifying assumptions. The random phase approximation (RPA) is a viable simplification for determining the electronic screening properties of the Coulomb interaction, particularly in band structures with sizable band gaps.
The many-body theory of interacting electrons poses an intrinsically difficult problem that requires simplifying assumptions. For the determination of electronic screening properties of the Coulomb interaction, the random phase approximation (RPA) provides such a simplification. Here we explicitly show that this approximation is justified for band structures with sizable band gaps. This is when the electronic states responsible for the screening are energetically far away from the Fermi level, which is equivalent to a short electronic propagation length of these states. The RPA contains exactly those diagrams in which the classical Coulomb interaction covers all distances, whereas neglected vertex corrections involve quantum tunneling through the barrier formed by the band gap. Our analysis of electron-electron interactions provides a real-space analogy to Migdal's theorem on the smallness of vertex corrections in electron-phonon problems. An important application is the increasing use of constrained RPA calculations of effective interactions. We find that their usage of Kohn-Sham energies accounts for the leading local (excitonic) vertex correction in insulators.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available