4.2 Article

Hybrid effects in field populations of the African monarch butterfly, Danaus chrysippus (L.) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)

Journal

BIOLOGICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY
Volume 133, Issue 3, Pages 671-684

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS

Keywords

Asymmetric crossing; Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller effect; body size; climate change; Haldane rule effect; heterosis; migration; non-random mating; reticulate evolution; speciation; wing length

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council or BBSRC [BB/H014268/1]
  2. BBSRC [BB/H014268/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study shows that hybrid effects, Haldane effect and Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller effects can be clearly observed in the African monarch butterfly in both laboratory and field settings, indicating the significance of these effects in different environments.
Heterosis, Haldane and Bateson-Dobzhansky-Muller effects have been widely documented amongst a range of plants and animals. However, typically these effects are shown by taking parents of known genotype into the laboratory and measuring components of the F, progeny under laboratory conditions. This leaves in doubt the real significance of such effects in the field. Here we use the well-known colour pattern genotypes of the African monarch or queen (Danaus chrysippus), which also control wing length, to test these effects both in the laboratory and in a contact zone in the field. By measuring the wing lengths in animals of known colour pattern genotype we show clear evidence for all three hybrid effects at the A and BC colour patterning loci, and importantly, that these same effects persist in the same presumptive F(1)s when measured in hybrid populations in the field. This demonstrates the power of a system in which genotypes can be directly inferred in the field and highlights that all three hybrid effects can be seen in the East African contact zone of this fascinating butterfly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available