The dynamics of theta-related pro-active control and response inhibition processes in AD(H)D

Impulsivity and deficits in response inhibition are hallmarks of attention-deficit(-hyperactivity) disorder (AD(H) D), can cause severe problems in daily functioning, and are thus of high clinical relevance. Traditionally, research to elucidate associated neural correlates has intensively, but also quite selectively examined mechanisms during response inhibition in various tasks. Doing so, in-between trial periods or periods prior to the response inhibition process, where no information relevant to inhibitory control is presented, have been neglected. Yet, these periods may nevertheless reveal relevant information. In the present study, using a case-control cross-sectional design, we take a more holistic approach, examining the inter-relation of pre-trial and within-trial periods in a Go/Nogo task with a focus on EEG theta band activity. Applying EEG beamforming methods, we show that the dynamics between pre-trial (pro-active) and within-trial (inhibition-related) control processes significantly differ between AD(H)D subtypes. We show that response inhibition, and differences between AD(H)D subtypes, exhibit distinct patterns of (at least) three factors: (i) strength of pre-trial (pro-active control) theta-band activity, (ii) the interrelation of pro-active control and inhibition-relation theta band activity and (iii) the functional neuroanatomical region active during theta-related pro-active control processes. This multi-factorial pattern is captured by AD(H) D subtype clinical symptom clusters. The study provides a first hint that novel cognitive-neurophysiological facets of AD(H)D may be relevant to distinguish AD(H)D subtypes.

Automated summary

This study utilized EEG theta band activity to examine the dynamics between pre-trial and within-trial control processes in AD(H)D subtypes, revealing significant differences. The results show distinct patterns of response inhibition and AD(H)D subtype differences in at least three factors, providing insight into potential cognitive-neurophysiological facets that may distinguish AD(H)D subtypes.