4.8 Review

Greenery as a mitigation and adaptation strategy to urban heat

Journal

NATURE REVIEWS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages 166-181

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s43017-020-00129-5

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urban green infrastructure is crucial for reducing urban heat, alleviating heat stress, and includes ground greenery and greenery on buildings. While these strategies can effectively cool the environment, the cooling potential varies depending on factors such as scale, extent of greenery, plant selection, and placement.
The absence of vegetation in urban areas contributes to the establishment of the urban heat island, markedly increasing thermal stress for residents, driving morbidity and mortality. Mitigation strategies are, therefore, needed to reduce urban heat, particularly against a background of urbanization, anthropogenic warming and increasing frequency and intensity of heatwaves. In this Review, we evaluate the potential of green infrastructure as a mitigation strategy, focusing on greenery on the ground (parks) and greenery on buildings (green roofs and green walls). Green infrastructure acts to cool the urban environment through shade provision and evapotranspiration. Typically, greenery on the ground reduces peak surface temperature by 2-9 degrees C, while green roofs and green walls reduce surface temperature by similar to 17 degrees C, also providing added thermal insulation for the building envelope. However, the cooling potential varies markedly, depending on the scale of interest (city or building level), greenery extent (park shape and size), plant selection and plant placement. Urban planners must, therefore, optimize design to maximize mitigation benefits, for example, by interspersing parks throughout a city, allocating more trees than lawn space and using multiple strategies in areas where most cooling is required. To do so, improved translation of scientific understanding to practical design guidelines is needed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available