4.7 Article

Practical use of visual medial temporal lobe atrophy cut-off scores in Alzheimer's disease: Validation in a large memory clinic population

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 3147-3155

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4726-3

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; Temporal lobe; Diagnostic imaging; Computed tomography; Clinical practice

Funding

  1. Tergooi Academy, Tergooi Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To provide age-specific medial temporal lobe atrophy (MTA) cut-off scores for routine clinical practice as marker for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Patients with AD (n = 832, mean age 81.8 years) were compared with patients with subjective cognitive impairment (n = 333, mean age 71.8 years) in a large single-centre memory clinic. Mean of right and left MTA scores was determined with visual rating (Scheltens scale) using CT (0, no atrophy to 4, severe atrophy). Relationships between age and MTA scores were analysed with regression analysis. For various MTA cut-off scores, decade-specific sensitivity and specificity and area under the curve (AUC) values, computed with receiver operator characteristic curves, were determined. MTA strongly increased with age in both groups to a similar degree. Optimal MTA cut-off values for the age ranges < 65, 65-74, 75-84 and ae85 were: ae1.0, ae1.5, ae 2.0 and ae2.0. Corresponding values of sensitivity and specificity were 83.3% and 86.4%; 73.7% and 84.6%; 73.7% and 76.2%; and 84.0% and 62.5%. From this large unique memory clinic cohort we suggest decade-specific MTA cut-off scores for clinical use. After age 85 years, however, the practical usefulness of the MTA cut-off is limited. aEuro cent We suggest decade-specific MTA cut-off scores for AD. aEuro cent MTA cut-off after the age of 85 years has limited use. aEuro cent CT is feasible and accurate for visual MTA rating.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available