4.7 Article

A predictive model for distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumour progression after gamma knife radiosurgery based on radiomic features from MR images

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 6, Pages 2255-2263

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5154-8

Keywords

Delta radiomic features; MRI; Radiation necrosis; Brain metastases; Gamma Knife radiosurgery

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P30CA016672]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To develop a model using radiomic features extracted from MR images to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumour progression in brain metastases after Gamma Knife radiosurgery. We retrospectively identified 87 patients with pathologically confirmed necrosis (24 lesions) or progression (73 lesions) and calculated 285 radiomic features from four MR sequences (T1, T1 post-contrast, T2, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery) obtained at two follow-up time points per lesion per patient. Reproducibility of each feature between the two time points was calculated within each group to identify a subset of features with distinct reproducible values between two groups. Changes in radiomic features from one time point to the next (delta radiomics) were used to build a model to classify necrosis and progression lesions. A combination of five radiomic features from both T1 post-contrast and T2 MR images were found to be useful in distinguishing necrosis from progression lesions. Delta radiomic features with a RUSBoost ensemble classifier had an overall predictive accuracy of 73.2% and an area under the curve value of 0.73 in leave-one-out cross-validation. Delta radiomic features extracted from MR images have potential for distinguishing radiation necrosis from tumour progression after radiosurgery for brain metastases. aEuro cent Some radiomic features showed better reproducibility for progressive lesions than necrotic ones aEuro cent Delta radiomic features can help to distinguish radiation necrosis from tumour progression aEuro cent Delta radiomic features had better predictive value than did traditional radiomic features.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available