Journal
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 10, Pages 4019-4029Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4767-2
Keywords
Lung cancer screening; Diagnostic imaging; Computer tomography; Solitary pulmonary nodule; Risk
Funding
- MeVis Medical Solutions AG, Bremen, Germany
Ask authors/readers for more resources
To compare the PanCan model, Lung-RADS and the 1.2016 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for discriminating malignant from benign pulmonary nodules on baseline screening CT scans and the impact diameter measurement methods have on performances. From the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial database, 64 CTs with malignant nodules and 549 baseline CTs with benign nodules were included. Performance of the systems was evaluated applying the system's original diameter definitions: Dlongest-C (PanCan), D-meanAxial (NCCN), both obtained from axial sections, and D-mean3D (Lung-RADS). Subsequently all diameter definitions were applied uniformly to all systems. Areas under the ROC curves (AUC) were used to evaluate risk discrimination. PanCan performed superiorly to Lung-RADS and NCCN (AUC 0.874 vs. 0.813, p = 0.003; 0.874 vs. 0.836, p = 0.010), using the original diameter specifications. When uniformly applying Dlongest-C, D-mean3D and D-meanAxial, PanCan remained superior to Lung-RADS (p < 0.001 - p = 0.001) and NCCN (p < 0.001 - p = 0.016). Diameter definition significantly influenced NCCN's performance with Dlongest-C being the worst (Dlongest-C vs. D-mean3D, p = 0.005; Dlongest-C vs. D-meanAxial, p = 0.016). Without follow-up information, the PanCan model performs significantly superiorly to Lung-RADS and the 1.2016 NCCN guidelines for discriminating benign from malignant nodules. The NCCN guidelines are most sensitive to nodule size definition. aEuro cent PanCan model outperforms Lung-RADS and 1.2016 NCCN guidelines in identifying malignant pulmonary nodules. aEuro cent Nodule size definition had no significant impact on Lung-RADS and PanCan model. aEuro cent 1.2016 NCCN guidelines were significantly superior when using mean diameter to longest diameter. aEuro cent Longest diameter achieved lowest performance for all models. aEuro cent Mean diameter performed equivalently when derived from axial sections and from volumetry.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available