4.7 Article

Can mechanical imaging increase the specificity of mammography screening?

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 8, Pages 3217-3225

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4723-6

Keywords

Mechanical imaging; Mammography; Breast screening; Recall rates; Biopsy rate

Funding

  1. Swedish Breast Cancer Association
  2. Stiftelsen for Cancerforskning vid Onklogiska kliniken vid Universitetssjukhuset MAS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aimed to investigate the effects of adding adjunct mechanical imaging to mammography breast screening. We hypothesized that mechanical imaging could detect increased local pressure caused by both malignant and benign breast lesions and that a pressure threshold for malignancy could be established. The impact of this on breast screening was investigated with regard to reductions in recall and biopsy rates. 155 women recalled from breast screening were included in the study, which was approved by the regional ethical review board (dnr 2013/620). Mechanical imaging readings were acquired of the symptomatic breast. The relative mean pressure on the suspicious area (RMPA) was defined and a threshold for malignancy was established. Biopsy-proven invasive cancers had a median RMPA of 3.0 (interquartile range (IQR) = 3.7), significantly different from biopsy-proven benign at 1.3 (IQR = 1.0) and non-biopsied cases at 1.0 (IQR = 1.3) (P < 0.001). The lowest RMPA for invasive cancer was 1.4, with 23 biopsy-proven benign and 33 non-biopsied cases being below this limit. Had these women not been recalled, recall rates would have been reduced by 36% and biopsy rates by 32%. If implemented in a screening situation, this may substantially lower the number of false positives. aEuro cent Mechanical imaging is used as an adjunct to mammography in breast screening. aEuro cent A threshold pressure can be established for malignant breast cancer. aEuro cent Recalls and biopsies can be substantially reduced.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available