4.7 Article

Portal hypertension is associated with poor outcome of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 2184-2193

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5145-9

Keywords

Hepatocellular carcinoma; Chemoembolization; therapeutic; Portal hypertension; Computed tomography; X-ray; Survival

Funding

  1. Korean Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI)
  2. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [HI15C2797]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To determine whether clinically relevant portal hypertension (CRPH) influences outcome and whether it may serve as a prognostic marker in patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). One hundred and forty-seven patients underwent conventional TACE as a first-line treatment for a single HCC. CRPH was graded as 0, 1, or 2. The influence of CRPH, together with other factors, on local tumour progression (LTP) and overall survival (OS) were analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression. A higher CRPH grade (grade 1, p = 0.005, hazard ratio [HR] = 3.282; grade 2, p < 0.001, HR = 7.144) and less selective catheterization (p = 0.009, HR = 1.951) were significantly associated with early LTP. Regarding OS, older age, (p < 0.001, HR = 1.050), CRPH grade 2 (p = 0.024, HR = 2.058), and a larger tumour (p < 0.001, HR = 1.454) were significantly associated with early death. Portal hypertension was significantly associated with poor outcome after TACE, and non-invasive CRPH grading may be a useful prognostic marker of TACE. aEuro cent Portal hypertension was significantly associated with poor outcome after TACE. aEuro cent Grading portal hypertension non-invasively can help predict TACE outcome in HCC patients. aEuro cent CRPH grading can aid in selecting optimal candidates for TACE.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available