4.7 Article

Intra-arterial therapy of neuroendocrine tumour liver metastases: comparing conventional TACE, drug-eluting beads TACE and yttrium-90 radioembolisation as treatment options using a propensity score analysis model

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 12, Pages 4995-5005

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-4856-2

Keywords

Neuroendocrine tumours; Chemoembolisation; Drug-eluting beads DEB; Yttrium-90 radioembolisation, Y90; Propensity score

Funding

  1. NIH/NCI [R01 CA206180, R01 CA160771]
  2. Studienstiftung des Deutschen Volkes
  3. Rolf W. Gunther Stiftung fur Radiologische Wissenschaften

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To compare efficacy, survival outcome and prognostic factors of conventional transarterial chemoembolisation (cTACE), drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE) and yttrium-90 radioembolisation (Y90) for the treatment of liver metastases from gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumours (NELM). This retrospective analysis included 192 patients (58.6 years mean age, 56% men) with NELM treated with cTACE (N = 122), DEB-TACE (N = 26) or Y90 (N = 44) between 2000 and 2014. Radiologic response to therapy was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria using periprocedural MR imaging. Survival analysis included propensity score analysis (PSA), median overall survival (MOS), hepatic progression-free survival, Kaplan-Meier using log-rank test and the uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (MVA). MOS of the entire study population was 28.8 months. As for cTACE, DEB-TACE and Y90, MOS was 33.8 months, 21.7 months and 23.6 months, respectively. According to the MVA, cTACE demonstrated a significantly longer MOS as compared to DEB-TACE (p <.01) or Y90 (p = .02). The 5-year survival rate after initial cTACE, DEB-TACE and Y90 was 28.2%, 10.3% and 18.5%, respectively. Upon PSA, our study suggests significant survival benefits for patients treated with cTACE as compared to DEB-TACE and Y90. This data supports the therapeutic decision for cTACE as the primary intra-arterial therapy option in patients with unresectable NELM until proven otherwise. aEuro cent cTACE achieved a significantly longer overall survival in patients with unresectable NELM. aEuro cent Patients treated with cTACE showed a prolonged hepatic progression-free survival. aEuro cent cTACE, DEB-TACE and Y90 radioembolisation demonstrated comparable safety and toxicity profiles. aEuro cent Age > 70 years, extrahepatic metastases and tumour burden > 50% were identified as negative predictors. aEuro cent Propensity score analysis suggests the superiority of cTACE over DEB-TACE and Y90.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available