4.4 Review

Prostaglandins for Postpartum Hemorrhage: Pharmacology, Application, and Current Opinion

Journal

PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 106, Issue 9-10, Pages 477-487

Publisher

KARGER
DOI: 10.1159/000516631

Keywords

Postpartum hemorrhage; Prostaglandins; Misoprostol; Pharmacology; Side effects

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LYY21H300006]
  2. Research funding project of Zhejiang Pharmaceutical Association [2016ZYY06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The review article examines the physiological roles of various natural PGs, assesses the evidence of PG analogs in preventing and treating PPH, and offers guidance to obstetricians for selecting appropriate uterotonics.
Background: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) remains a common cause of maternal mortality worldwide. Medical intervention plays an important role in the prevention and treatment of PPH. Prostaglandins (PGs) are currently recommended as second-line uterotonics, which are applied in cases of persistent bleeding despite oxytocin treatment. Summary: PG agents that are constantly used in clinical practice include carboprost, sulprostone, and misoprostol, representing the analogs of PGF(2 alpha), PGE(2), and PGE(1), respectively. Injectable PGs, when used to treat PPH, are effective in reducing blood loss but probably induce cardiovascular or respiratory side effects. Misoprostol is characterized by oral administration, low cost, stability in storage, broad availability, and minimal side effects. It remains a treatment option for uterine atony in low-resource settings, but its effectiveness as a uterotonic for independent application may be limited. Key Messages: The present review article discusses the physiological roles of various natural PGs, evaluates the existing evidence of PG analogs in the prevention and treatment of PPH, and finally provides a reference to assist obstetricians in selecting appropriate uterotonics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available