4.0 Review

Sarcocystis neurona and related Sarcocystis spp. shed by opossums (Didelphis spp.) in South America

Journal

Publisher

BRAZILIAN COLL VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
DOI: 10.1590/S1984-29612021059

Keywords

Sarcocystis neurona; Sarcocystis falcatula; marsupial; Sarcocystidae

Funding

  1. National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq)
  2. Coordination Office for the Improvement of Higher-Education Personnel (CAPES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sarcocystis parasites are obligate heteroxenous cyst-forming coccidia that infect a wide variety of animals, with species shed by South American opossums showing biological and genetic differences from those shed by North American opossums.
Protozoan parasites of the genus Sarcocystis are obligatory heteroxenous cyst-forming coccidia that infect a wide variety of animals and encompass approximately 200 described species. At least four Sarcocystis spp. (S. falcatula, S. neurona, S. lindsayi and S. speeri) use opossums (Didelphis spp.) as definitive hosts, and two of them, S. neurona and S. falcatula, are known to cause disease in horses and birds, respectively. Opossums are restricted to the Americas, but their distribution in the Americas is heterogeneous. Five Didelphis spp. are distributed in South America (D. aurita, D. albiventris, D. marsupialis, D. imperfecta and D. pernigra) whereas just one opossum species (D. virginiana) is found in North America. Studies conducted in the last decades show that Sarcocystis spp., derived from South American Didelphis spp., have biological and genetic differences in relation to Sarcocystis spp. shed by the North American opossum D. virginiana. The aim of this review was to address the peculiar scenario of Sarcocystis species shed by South American opossums, with a special focus on diagnosis, epidemiology, and animal infections, as well as the genetic characteristics of these parasites.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available