4.8 Article

Cost and low-carbon competitiveness of electrolytic hydrogen in China

Journal

ENERGY & ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE
Volume 14, Issue 9, Pages 4868-4881

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1ee01840j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1866208]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20200013]
  3. National Key R&D Program of China [2020YFE0200400]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assesses the cost and low-carbon competitiveness of electrolytic hydrogen in China, finding that implementing time-of-use electricity prices and subsidizing photovoltaics can improve cost and CO2 emissions performance. Different types and levels of subsidies should be carefully adopted based on provincial characteristics.
To quantify the cost and low-carbon competitiveness of electrolytic hydrogen in China, this paper presents a detailed assessment of the levelized cost of electrolytic hydrogen produced by a photovoltaic and grid-based hydrogen system (PGHS). This assessment considers the provincial differences in electricity prices, shares of renewables in power grids, and solar radiations in China. We find that in 2019, the levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH2) in 31 provinces varies from 31.5 yen per kg to 46.8 yen per kg in the single electricity price scenario, and reduces by up to 5.5 yen per kg when implementing a time-of-use price. In terms of CO2 emissions, we demonstrate that electrolytic hydrogen has greater CO2 emissions than the widespread coal-based hydrogen in 21 out of 31 provinces of China. The results suggest that implementing time-of-use electricity prices and subsidizing photovoltaics, instead of electricity prices and electrolyzers, can improve the performance of electric hydrogen production in terms of cost and CO2 emissions. Further provincial analysis considering hydrogen demand potentials shows that, under stricter CO2 emission constraints, substituting fossil fuel with electrolytic hydrogen can reduce CO2 emissions. However, its popularization is impeded by fossil fuels with low costs. Due to the regional differentiation in the cost competitiveness of electrolytic hydrogen, different types and levels of subsidies should be carefully adopted depending on the provincial characteristics in electricity prices, solar radiations, renewable integrations, fossil fuel prices, and hydrogen demand potentials. In the end, when comparing seven pathways towards electrolytic hydrogen development from 2020 to 2050, we find that the production cost of the electrolytic hydrogen is unbundled from the restriction of CO2 emission requirements after 2030, and a high carbon price may accelerate the cost competitiveness of electrolytic hydrogen by decades.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available