4.3 Article

Balancing bike sharing systems with constraint programming

Journal

CONSTRAINTS
Volume 21, Issue 2, Pages 318-348

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10601-015-9182-1

Keywords

Applications; Constraint programming; Hybrid meta-heuristics; Large neighborhood search; Optimization; Vehicle routing

Funding

  1. Austrian Federal Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology within the strategic program I2VSplus [831740]
  2. Google Focused Grant Program on Mathematical optimization and combinatorial optimization in Europe
  3. Australian Government through the Department of Communications
  4. Australian Research Council through the ICT Centre of Excellence Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bike sharing systems need to be properly rebalanced to meet the demand of users and to operate successfully. However, the problem of Balancing Bike Sharing Systems (BBSS) is a demanding task: it requires the design of optimal tours and operating instructions for relocating bikes among stations to maximally comply with the expected future bike demands. In this paper, we tackle the BBSS problem by means of Constraint Programming (CP). First, we introduce two different CP models for the BBSS problem including two custom branching strategies that focus on the most promising routes. Second, we incorporate both models in a Large Neighborhood Search (LNS) approach that is adapted to the respective CP model. Third, we perform an experimental evaluation of our approaches on three different benchmark sets of instances derived from real-world bike sharing systems. We show that our CP models can be easily adapted to the different benchmark problem setups, demonstrating the benefit of using Constraint Programming to address the BBSS problem. Furthermore, in our experimental evaluation, we see that the pure CP (branch & bound) approach outperforms the state-of-the-art MILP on large instances and that the LNS approach is competitive with other existing approaches.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available