4.7 Article

Frequency-Modulated Chirp Signals for Single-Photodiode Based Coherent LiDAR System

Journal

JOURNAL OF LIGHTWAVE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 14, Pages 4661-4670

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JLT.2021.3081255

Keywords

Frequency modulation; Amplitude modulation; Chirp; Laser radar; Sensitivity; Laser noise; Time-frequency analysis; Coherent detection; frequency-modulated continuous-wave; light detection and ranging

Funding

  1. U.K. EPSRC TRANSNET [EP/R035342/1]
  2. UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship [MR/T041218/1]
  3. EPSRC [EP/R035342/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. UKRI [MR/T041218/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates two types of linear frequency-modulated chirp signals suitable for single-photodiode LiDAR systems, FMCW SSB signal and DSB signal, and compares their receiver sensitivity performance. The SSB signal outperforms the DSB signal in system tests.
In this paper, we investigate two categories of linear frequency-modulated chirp signals suitable for single-photodiode based coherent light detection and ranging (LiDAR) systems, namely, the frequency-modulated continuous-wave (FMCW) single-sideband (SSB) signal and the amplitude-modulated double-sideband (DSB) signal, and compare their achievable receiver sensitivity performance. The DSB signal requires a simpler transmitter design, as it is real-valued and can be generated using a single-drive Mach-Zehnder modulator (MZM), while the SSB signal, which is frequency/phase modulated, requires an in-phase and quadrature modulator (IQM)-based transmitter. A theoretical analysis of direct-detection (DD) beating interference (BI) especially the local oscillator (LO) beating with itself, known as LO-LO BI, is presented. Both Monte Carlo simulations and experimental demonstrations are carried out. Good agreement between simulations and experiments is achieved. In comparison with the SSB system, the DSB signal-based system is affected by laser phase noise-induced power fluctuation, and also suffers a significant sensitivity penalty due to nonlinear LO-LO BI. A spectral guard band for mitigating LO-LO BI is necessary for the DSB signal, achieved at the expense of requiring a larger electrical bandwidth. In system tests with a delay line of 385 m, the SSB signal outperforms the DSB signal with a 10 dB better receiver sensitivity in the case with a guard band, and 25 dB better sensitivity without a guard band.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available