4.6 Article

Contextuality of General Probabilistic Theories

Journal

PRX QUANTUM
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.2.010330

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Royal Commission
  2. European Union Quantum Technology Flagship [820495]
  3. Ser SAM Project at Swansea University
  4. Welsh Government's Ser Cymru II Program (European Regional Development Fund)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concept of generalized contextuality studies the inability to explain measurement statistics using a context-independent probabilistic and ontological model, instead looking at frameworks such as general probabilistic theories (GPTs) to model these statistics. It is found that GPTs satisfying the no-restriction hypothesis are ontologically noncontextual only when they are simplicial, while GPTs violating this hypothesis can be considered as subtheories of GPTs satisfying the hypothesis. Subtheories are ontologically noncontextual if they are subtheories of simplicial GPTs of the same dimensionality.
Generalized contextuality refers to our inability of explaining measurement statistics using a context-independent probabilistic and ontological model. On the other hand, measurement statistics can also be modeled using the framework of general probabilistic theories (GPTs). Here, starting from a construction of GPTs based on a Gleason-type theorem, we fully characterize these structures with respect to their permission and rejection of generalized (non)contextual ontological models. It follows that in any GPT construction the three insistence of (i) the no-restriction hypothesis, (ii) the ontological noncontextuality, and (iii) multiple nonrefinable measurements for any fixed number of outcomes are incompatible. Hence, any GPT satisfying the no-restriction hypothesis is ontologically noncontextual if and only if it is simplicial. We give a detailed discussion of GPTs for which the no-restriction hypothesis is violated, and show that they can always be considered as subtheories (subGPTs) of GPTs satisfying the hypothesis. It is shown that subGPTs are ontologically noncontextual if and only if they are subtheories of simplicial GPTs of the same dimensionality. Finally, we establish as a corollary the necessary and sufficient condition for a single resourceful measurement or state to promote an ontologically noncontextual (i.e., classical) general probabilistic theory to an ontologically contextual (i.e., nonclassical) one under the no-restriction hypothesis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available