4.6 Article

The role of orientation in the MEL response of OLEDs

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
Volume 9, Issue 31, Pages 10052-10064

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d1tc00314c

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology [70NANB17H305]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMREF-1627428]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Magneto electroluminescence (MEL) is used as a tool to study spin dynamics in organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) in this study. A quantitative model for MEL is developed and applied to devices based on different emitters, revealing that structured responses are found in textured films and additional structures exist in intersections of singlet character between adjacent states. The MEL responses can be adequately described by an extended Merrifield model, providing insights into the underlying physics in OLED devices through the inclusion of charge injection.
Magneto electroluminescence (MEL) is emerging as a powerful tool to study spin dynamics in organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs). The shape of the MEL response is typically used to draw qualitative inference on the dominant process (singlet fission or triplet fusion) in the device. In this study, we develop a quantitative model for MEL and apply it to devices based on rubrene, and three solution processable anthradithiophene emitters. The four emitters allow us to systematically vary the film structure between highly textured, poly-crystalline to amorphous. We find significant diversity in the MEL, with the textured films giving highly structured responses. We find that the additional structure does not coincide with energy anti-crossings, but intersections in the singlet character between adjacent states. In all cases the MEL can be adequately described by an extended Merrifield model. Via the inclusion of charge injection, we are able to draw additional information on underlying physics in OLED devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available