4.3 Article

Residue Specific Binding Mechanisms of PD-1 to Its Monoclonal Antibodies by Computational Alanine Scanning

Journal

CHEMICAL JOURNAL OF CHINESE UNIVERSITIES-CHINESE
Volume 42, Issue 7, Pages 2161-2169

Publisher

HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS
DOI: 10.7503/cjcu20210245

Keywords

PD-1; Computational alanine scanning; Monoclonal antibodies; MM/GBSA; Interaction entropy

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0501700]
  2. Major Reaserch Plan of National Natural Science Foundation of China [91753103]
  3. State Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China [21933010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molecular dynamics simulations were conducted on two PD-1/monoclonal antibody complexes, pembrolizumab and nivolumab, revealing different binding mechanisms. Both complexes share (PD-1)K131 as a binding hotspot, dominated by van der Waals energy. Improving the contributions of electrostatic energy may enhance the efficiency of monoclonal antibodies binding to PD-1.
Molecular dynamics simulations were conducted on two PD-1/monoclonal antibody ( pembrolizumab , nivolumab) complexes separately. The binding hotspots of the monoclonal antibody (mAb) and PD-1 were predicted by using efficient computational alanine scanning method. The comparation between the predicted hotspots and the important residues in PD-1/PD-L1 complex shows that pembrolizumab combines with PD-1 in a way similar to PD-L1, while nivolumab combines with PD-1 in a more different way by N-loop. (PD-1)K131 is the only hotspot shared by the two PD-1/mAb complexes. It is also found that key residues of mAbs binding to (D-1)K131 are similarly dominated by van der Waals (vdW) energy. Furthermore, hotspots on both the monoclonal antibodies are dominated by vdW energy, indicating a demand to improve the contributions of electrostatic energy. The present work provides important insights for the design of new mAbs targeting PD-1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available