4.6 Article

Simplified Approach for Seismic Performance Assessment of Dry-Joint Masonry Arch Bridges

Journal

BUILDINGS
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/buildings11070313

Keywords

dry-joint masonry arch; stone masonry; numerical modeling; time history analysis; thrust line; seismic performance; retrofitting

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study proposes a hybrid methodology for assessing the seismic performance of dry-joint masonry arches, combining a simple finite element micro model with principles of limit analysis method. Kinematic conditions leading to possible collapse mechanisms were traced and applied to evaluate seismic risk of an ancient Roman arch bridge in close proximity to a fault line.
The seismic performance assessment of dry-joint masonry arches is challenging because of their unique structural characteristics. Widely used assessment methods developed for frame-type structures require the use of a material-dependent section response. In contrast, the response of a dry-joint arch is not dependent on the material capacity but characterized by the sustainment of stability, primarily depending on rigid body rotation or sliding motion at the interfaces between the adjacent voussoirs. A hybrid methodology, combining a simple finite element micro model with principles of limit analysis method, is proposed in this work for the seismic performance assessment of these structures. The nonlinearity is concentrated at interfaces of the model by means of shear and compression-only axial springs. Kinematic conditions yielding a possible collapse mechanism were traced at every step of the time history analysis by checking the failure of individual interfaces. The procedure is applied to an ancient dry-joint Roman arch bridge in close proximity to the North Anatolian fault subject to significant seismic risk. Along with the performance of the system in its current state, the effects of retrofitting measures were investigated in the scope of this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available