4.4 Article

Royal society of Canada COVID-19 report: Enhancing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in Canada

Journal

FACETS
Volume 6, Issue -, Pages 1184-1246

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/facets-2021-0037

Keywords

vaccine hesitancy; vaccine acceptance; vaccine uptake; COVID vaccine; vaccine acceptance framework; law and vaccines; vaccine communications; vaccine mis/disinformation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Acceptance of COVID-19 vaccines varies among different groups, influenced by a wide range of factors such as knowledge, attitudes, social networks, and cultural influences. To optimize vaccine acceptance, comprehensive strategies must be implemented considering all these factors to improve vaccination rates.
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance exists on a continuum from a minority who strongly oppose vaccination, to the moveable middle heterogeneous group with varying uncertainty levels about acceptance or hesitancy, to the majority who state willingness to be vaccinated. Intention for vaccine acceptance varies over time. COVID-19 vaccination decisions are influenced by many factors including knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs; social networks; communication environment; COVID-19 community rate; cultural and religious influences; ease of access; and the organization of health and community services and policies. Reflecting vaccine acceptance complexity, the Royal Society of Canada Working Group on COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance developed a framework with four major factor domains that influence vaccine acceptance (people, communities, health care workers; immunization knowledge; health care and public health systems including federal/provincial/territorial/indigenous factors)-each influencing the others and all influenced by education, infection control, extent of collaborations, and communications about COVID-19 immunization. The Working Group then developed 37 interrelated recommendations to support COVID vaccine acceptance nested under four categories of responsibility: 1. People and Communities, 2. Health Care Workers, 3. Health Care System and Local Public Health Units, and 4. Federal/Provincial/Territorial/Indigenous. To optimize outcomes, all must be engaged to ensure co-development and broad ownership. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available