4.0 Article

On the Representation of Hyporheic Exchange in Models for Reactive Transport in Stream and River Corridors

Journal

FRONTIERS IN WATER
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/frwa.2020.595538

Keywords

hyporheic zone; reactive transport; multiscale modeling; stochastic hydrological modeling; contaminant transport

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Biological and Environmental Research, Subsurface Biogeochemical Research (SBR) Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efforts to incorporate detailed representations of biogeochemical processes in basin-scale water quality simulation tools face the challenge of representing mass exchange between flowing channels and biogeochemical hotspots. Multiscale models with coarse channel network representations and subgrid models for mass exchange and reactions in the hyporheic zone have emerged to address this challenge. However, two different multiscale models show significantly different results in reactive transport, indicating that conservative tracer tests alone are insufficient for constraining representation of mass transfer in models for reactive transport in streams and rivers.
Efforts to include more detailed representations of biogeochemical processes in basin-scale water quality simulation tools face the challenge of how to tractably represent mass exchange between the flowing channels of streams and rivers and biogeochemical hotspots in the hyporheic zones. Multiscale models that use relatively coarse representations of the channel network with subgrid models for mass exchange and reactions in the hyporheic zone have started to emerge to address that challenge. Two such multiscale models are considered here, one based on a stochastic Lagrangian travel time representation of advective pumping and one on multirate diffusive exchange. The two models are formally equivalent to well-established integrodifferential representations for transport of non-reacting tracers in steady stream flow, which have been very successful in reproducing stream tracer tests. Despite that equivalence, the two models are based on very different model structures and produce significantly different results in reactive transport. In a simple denitrification example, denitrification is two to three times greater for the advection-based model because the multirate diffusive model has direct connections between the stream channel and transient storage zones and an assumption of mixing in the transient storage zones that prevent oxygen levels from dropping to the point where denitrification can progress uninhibited. By contrast, the advection-based model produces distinct redox zonation, allowing for denitrification to proceed uninhibited on part of the hyporheic flowpaths. These results demonstrate that conservative tracer tests alone are inadequate for constraining representation of mass transfer in models for reactive transport in streams and rivers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available