Journal
EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 40, Issue -, Pages 116-122Publisher
ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.08.008
Keywords
Stigma; Global mental health; Epidemiology; Social marketing campaign
Categories
Funding
- UK Government Department of Health, Comic Relief and Big Lottery Fund
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Applied Programme
- Big Lottery
- UK Department of Health and Comic Relief
- ER during phase 2
- NIHR, Maudsley Charity and Guy's and St Thomas's Charity
- European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7) Emerald project
- Department of Health via the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre and Dementia Unit
- King's College London
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
- NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care South London at King's College London Foundation Trust
- National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0611-10053] Funding Source: researchfish
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Background: In England, during 2009-2014 the 'Time to Change' anti-stigma programme has included a social marketing campaign (SMC) using mass media channels, social media and social contact events but the efficacy of such approach has not been evaluated yet. Methods: The target population included people aged between mid-twenties/mid-forties, from middle income groups. Participants were recruited through an online market research panel, before and after each burst of the campaign (with a mean number of unique participants per each burst: 956.9 +/- 170.2). Participants completed an online questionnaire evaluating knowledge [Mental Health Knowledge Schedule (MANS)]: attitudes [Community Attitudes toward Mental Illness (CAMI)]; and behaviours [Reported and Intended Behaviour Scale (RIBS)]. Socio-demographic data and level of awareness of the SMC were also collected. Results: A total of 10,526 people were interviewed. An increasing usage of the SMC-media channels as well as of the level of awareness of SMC was found (P < 0.001). Being aware of the SMC was found to be associated with higher score at MAKS (OR = 0.95, CI = 0.68 to 1.21; P < 0.001), at 'tolerance and support' CAMI subscale (OR = 0.12, Cl = 0.09 to 0.16; P < 0.001), and at RIBS (OR = 0.71, CI = 0.51 to 0.92; P < 0.001), controlling for confounders. Conclusion: The SMC represents an important way to effectively reduce stigma. Taking into account these positive findings, further population-based campaigns using social media may represent an effective strategy to challenge stigma. (C) 2016 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available