4.6 Article

Trends in research related to the Dark Triad: A bibliometric analysis

Journal

CURRENT PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 40, Issue 7, Pages 3206-3215

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12144-019-00250-9

Keywords

Dark Triad traits; Life history strategy; short Dark Triad measures; Personality models; Gender differences; Bibliometric analysis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to investigate trends in Dark Triad related research using bibliometric analysis. Four main clusters were identified: Dark Triad traits, measurement, personality models, and gender differences. The latest research mainly focused on measurement and personality models, particularly studies related to short Dark Triad measures and sadism.
The aim of this study was to investigate trends in research related to the Dark Triad using a bibliometric analysis. Four main clusters were recognized on author keywords: Dark Triad traits (Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy, along with terms such are life history theory, mating, and morality), measurement (short Dark Triad measures and terms related to psychometrics), personality models (Big Five, Five Factor Model, HEXACO, and terms related to sadism and aggression), and mainly gender differences cluster. The measurement and personality models clusters gathered the latest research, but specifically studies containing terms related to short Dark Triad measures and sadism. Analysis of the indexed keywords revealed a similar organization of the clusters, but with a great prominence of clinical studies and methodological terms. The map of bibliographic coupling showed several relatively separated groups of authors with different focus in cited references, with Jonason, P.K. in the central position. However, a map of co-citation of authors revealed closeness of these separated groups, with Jonason, P.K. and Paulhus, D.L. with nearly equal number of citations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available