4.8 Review

Triggering biological processes: methods and applications of photocaged peptides and proteins

Journal

CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS
Volume 50, Issue 18, Pages 10403-10421

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cs01434f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Robert A. Welch Foundation Research Grant [C-1680]
  2. National Science Foundation [CHE-1904865]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In recent years, there has been a significant effort to apply the fundamental knowledge and methods of photochemistry to biological purposes. Photoreactive groups have enabled chemists to activate biological function through the concept of photocaging, providing spatiotemporal control over protein activation. The review highlights recent advances in photocaging techniques and methodologies, emphasizing their importance in understanding biological processes and the challenges faced in precise chemoselectivity within complex environments.
There has been a significant push in recent years to deploy fundamental knowledge and methods of photochemistry toward biological ends. Photoreactive groups have enabled chemists to activate biological function using the concept of photocaging. By granting spatiotemporal control over protein activation, these photocaging methods are fundamental in understanding biological processes. Peptides and proteins are an important group of photocaging targets that present conceptual and technical challenges, requiring precise chemoselectivity in complex polyfunctional environments. This review focuses on recent advances in photocaging techniques and methodologies, as well as their use in living systems. Photocaging methods include genetic and chemical approaches that require a deep understanding of structure-function relationships based on subtle changes in primary structure. Successful implementation of these ideas can shed light on important spatiotemporal aspects of living systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available