Journal
EUROINTERVENTION
Volume 17, Issue 4, Pages E309-+Publisher
EUROPA EDITION
DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-20-00684
Keywords
absolute coronary blood flow; absolute coronary resistance; clinical research; coronary circulation; fractional flow reserve; microvascular resistance; other technique
Categories
Funding
- CardioPath
- Fondation Vaudoise de Cardiologie
- Fondation Vaudoise de Cardiologie Interventionnelle
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study aimed to assess normal reference values of coronary hyperemic blood flow and resistance, finding that hyperemic flow was significantly higher in controls compared to patients in different coronary arteries. However, when considering vessel-specific myocardial mass, hyperemic flow was similar in the three vascular territories.
Background: Absolute hyperaemic coronary blood flow (Q, in mL/min) and resistance (R, in Wood units [WU]) can be measured invasively by continuous thermodilution. Aims: The aim of this study was to assess normal reference values of Q and R. Methods: In 177 arteries (69 patients: 25 controls, i.e., without identifiable coronary atherosclerosis; 44 patients with mild, non-obstructive atherosclerosis), thermodilution-derived hyperaemic Q and total, epicardial, and microvascular absolute resistances (R-tot, R-epi, and R-micro) were measured. In 20 controls and 29 patients, measurements were obtained in all three major coronary arteries, thus allowing calculations of Q and R for the whole heart. In 15 controls (41 vessels) and 25 patients (71 vessels), vessel-specific myocardial mass was derived from coronary computed tomography angiography. Results: Whole heart hyperaemic Q tended to be higher in controls compared to patients (668 +/- 185 vs 582 +/- 138 mL/min, p=0.068). In the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), hyperaemic Q was significantly higher (293 +/- 102 mL/min versus 228 +/- 71 mL/min, p=0.004) in controls than in patients. This was driven mainly by a difference in R-epi (43 +/- 23 vs 83 +/- 41 WU, p=0.048), without significant differences in R-micro. After adjustment for vessel-specific myocardial mass, hyperaemic Q was similar in the three vascular territories (5.9 +/- 1.9, 4.9 +/- 1.7, and 5.3 +/- 2.1 mL/min/g, p=0.44, in the LAD, left circumflex and right coronary artery, respectively). Conclusions: The present report provides reference values of absolute coronary hyperaemic Q and R. Q was homogeneously distributed in the three major myocardial territories but the large ranges of observed hyperaemic values of flow and of microvascular resistance preclude their clinical use for inter-patient comparison.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available