4.7 Article

Trends in management of hip and knee osteoarthritis in general practice in Australia over an 11-year window: a nationwide cross-sectional survey

Journal

LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH-WESTERN PACIFIC
Volume 12, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100187

Keywords

osteoarthritis; general practice; knee; hip

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca Pty Ltd (Australia)
  2. Australian Government Department of Health
  3. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Australia Pty Ltd
  4. Seqirus (Australia) Pty Ltd
  5. Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd
  6. Australian Government Department of Veterans' Affairs
  7. AbbVie Pty Ltd
  8. Merck, Sharpe and Dohme (Australia) Pty Ltd
  9. Pfizer Australia
  10. National Prescribing Service
  11. GlaxoSmithKline Australia Pty Ltd
  12. Bayer Australia Ltd
  13. Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd
  14. Abbott Australasia Pty Ltd
  15. Wyeth Australia Pty Ltd
  16. Roche Products Pty Ltd
  17. Aventis Pharma Pty Ltd.
  18. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Research Excellence in Translational Research in Musculoskeletal Pain [1079078]
  19. NHMRC Investigator Fellowship [1174431]
  20. NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship [1082138]
  21. NHMRC Early Career Fellowship [1163058]
  22. NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship [1154217]
  23. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1082138, 1174431, 1163058] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study showed that GPs in Australia are increasingly managing knee and hip OA, with low utilization of recommended non-pharmacological treatments and high rates of imaging, medication, and surgical referrals. Strategies are needed to optimize lifestyle management and reduce low-value care in OA management.
Background: We aimed to describe trends in knee and hip OA management by general medical practitioners (GPs) in Australia. Methods: We analysed cross-sectional survey data from the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health (BEACH) program (1,0 00 randomly-selected GPs annually recording 100 consecutive patient encounters) over two periods: Period one April 1, 2005-March 31, 2010 and period two April 1, 2010-March 31, 2016. This included data from 10,738 GPs and 1,073,800 patient encounters with 6,565 GPs and 9,196 patient encounters for hip/knee OA. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics and 95% confidence intervals around point estimates. Findings: Rate of knee OA problems managed by GPs increased in period two (7.1 (6.9-7.4) vs 6.2 (95% CI 6.0-6.5) per 1,000 all encounters), with a similar trend for hip OA. Encounter rates rose for some subgroups but remained stable for vulnerable subgroups. Although use of Medicare chronic disease management items, referral to allied health professionals and advice/education and lifestyle management (knee OA) increased, rates remained low. Use of MRI imaging rose. Overall medication rates were stable but substantially higher than non-pharmacological treatments. Declining reliance on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and glucosamine and increased reliance on paracetamol (knee OA) and opioids were demonstrated. Interpretation: GPs in Australia are more frequently managing knee and hip OA. While small changes in GP management actions occured, rates of recommended first-line non-pharmacological treatments remained low and imaging, medications, and surgical referral rates high. Strategies are needed to optimise lifestyle management and reduce low-value care, with attention to healthcare disparities. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available