4.6 Article

HA U-Net: Improved Model for Building Extraction From High Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery

Journal

IEEE ACCESS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages 101972-101984

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3097630

Keywords

Buildings; Feature extraction; Image segmentation; Remote sensing; Predictive models; Training; Task analysis; Deep learning; building extraction; holistically-nested neural network; attention mechanism; weight mapping; watershed algorithm

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a novel method and model for automatic extraction of buildings from high-resolution remote sensing images, achieving improved segmentation accuracy and performance.
Automatic extraction of buildings from high-resolution remote sensing images becomes an important research. Since the convolutional neural network can perform pixel-level segmentation, this technology has been applied in this field. But the increase in resolution prone to blurry segmentation because the model needs more edge detail and multi-scale detail learning. To solve this problem, a method is proposed in this paper, which consists of three parts: (1) an improved model named Holistically-Nested Attention U-Net (HA U-Net) is designed, which integrates the attention mechanism and multi-scale nested modules to supervise prediction; (2) During model training, an improved weighted loss function is proposed to make the designed model more focused on learning boundary features; (3) watershed algorithm is exploited for image post-processing to optimize segmentation results. The designed HA U-Net performs well on WHU Building Dataset and Urban3d Challenge dataset, and achieves 9.31%, 2.17% better F1-score and 10.78%, 1.77% better IOU than the standard U-Net respectively. The experimental results indicate that the proposed method can well solve the building adhesion problem. The research can serve as updating geographic databases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available