4.6 Article

Polymorphism of gold under laser-based ramp compression to 690 GPa

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
Volume 103, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.103.184109

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Nuclear Security Agency [DE-NA0002007, DE-NA0003957]
  2. National Laser Users' Facility [DE-NA0002720, DE-NA0003611]
  3. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under US Department of Energy [DE-AC52-07NA2734]
  4. US Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration [DE-NA0001944]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates the high-pressure behavior and polymorphism of gold by dynamically compressing it up to 690 GPa, revealing its transformation from the face-centered cubic phase to the body-centered cubic phase under extreme conditions. The results are in line with recent shock-compression experiments and provide insight into the phase transition characteristics of gold under different loading conditions.
The high-pressure behavior and polymorphism of gold have attracted strong recent interest from theory as well as from both static and dynamic experiments. In this study, gold was dynamically ramp-compressed to 690 GPa via laser ablation using the Omega Laser Facility (University of Rochester) in order to investigate the stability regions of this noble metal's polymorphs. Stresses were determined from measurements of surface or interface velocities by laser interferometry. In situ x-ray diffraction was carried out to constrain the structure and density. The ambient face-centered-cubic (fcc) phase was observed at 162 GPa, followed by a mixed-phase region consisting of the fcc and body-centered-cubic (bcc) phases. The presence of only the bcc phase was observed between 377 and 690 GPa. Our results are consistent with recent shock-compression experiments and demonstrate that gold transforms to the bcc phase under conditions of both ramp and shock loading.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available